If its still not there, we recommend you write to the Editor-in-Chief regarding the same and request the editor to send a copy of the decision letter. We argue that there is an additional reason for researchers to respect the dissent . 2022.5.11 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received, 2022.5.12 Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration, 6.2Manuscript under considerationNS, Decision sent to author, NZip for reviewers, 9All Reviewers Assigned109Manuscript under consideration, 2022.10.10 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, , comments, #1, #2, #3IMEC&, 2022.11.23 Manuscript under submission/Manuscript received/Editor assigned/Manuscript under consideration (), 2022.11.25 Editor Decision Started (All Reviewer Assigned), 1212All Reviewer AssignedManuscript under consideration, 2022.12.13 Manuscript under consideration/Decision sent to author/Waiting for revision, #1hhhh, #3comment. It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and comments. Further consideration may be merited if a reviewer made substantial errors of fact or there is significant evidence of bias, but only if a reversal of that reviewer's opinion would have changed the original decision. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. Thank you for visiting nature.com. So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. I submitted a paper to Nature on Sunday Nov 20. My father emptied the thing at an unknown date ruining my spontaneous project, but at least I was able to recover the skull, jaw, spine & ribs. Share your preprint and track your manuscript's review progress with our In Review service. Decision sent to author NZip for reviewers Clicking on the "Submissions being processed" link. Difficult to follow logic or poorly presented data. If an appeal merits further consideration, the editors may send the authors' response or the revised paper to one or more reviewers, or they may ask one reviewer to comment on the concerns raised by another reviewer. ago. [CDATA[> Reviewer comment: In your analysis of the data you have chosen to use a somewhat obscure fitting function (regression). Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. NOTE: The review process can take anywhere from one to four months, depending on the availability of reviewers and their timeliness in returning reviews. Of course a desk reject can happen anytime but I was wondering if anyone had insight especially when submitting to Nature. Answer: Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. ghost and angela first love scene,